Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A comparative analysis of histological grading systems

---

Case Series

Author Details : Vaishali Anil Nandkhedkar, Mandakini Mandale*, Jayanti Humbe, Savita Prashant Wagh, Shubhankar Anil Nandkhedkar

Volume : 10, Issue : 2, Year : 2024

Article Page : 107-112

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2024.019

Suggest article by email

Get Permission

---

Abstract

Background: Salivary gland carcinomas comprise of only 3-5% of all head and neck malignancies. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. The morphologic diversity of MEC can pose diagnostic challenges hence, various histological grading systems have been proposed based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis. This proves to be greatly consequential in the management and prognosis of patients with MEC.
To compare histologic grading methods in MEC of major & minor salivary glands.
Materials and Methods: 20 histopathologically diagnosed cases of MEC (10 each major & minor salivary gland) will be analysed using following methods: Qualitative Method: 1) Modified Healey 2) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center method. Quantitative method: 1) Armed force Institute of Pathology (AFIP) 2) Brandwein method Histological findings were evaluated.
Result: In our study AFIP grading system, 50% Cases were classified as low grade, 35% as intermediate grade and 15% as high graded. According to Brandwein grading system20% of cases were categorized as low, 35% cases as intermediate, 45% cases as high grade MEC. Modified Healey grading system of MEC showed 50%, 40%, 10% cases as low, intermediate and high grade MEC respectively. MSKCC grading system revealed as 55%, 30% and 15% cases as low, intermediate and high grade MEC respectively. Our finding indicated that MSKCC grading system was the most favourable histological grading system as percentage of agreement found to be 85%.
Conclusion: Careful microscopic examination is the most important parameter in the grading of MEC. This meticulous microscopic examination emerges as the cornerstone in grading MEC. Both MSKCC and Modified Healey grading methods exhibits effectiveness in evaluating MEC. Our finding indicated that Memorial Slon Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) was the most favourable histological grading system as percentage of agreement found to be 85%. However, further longer studies are imperative to substantiate this finding and for establish of universally accepted grading system for Mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Keywords: Histological grading systems, Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Salivary gland tumour.

How to cite : Nandkhedkar V A, Mandale M, Humbe J, Wagh S P, Nandkhedkar S A, Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A comparative analysis of histological grading systems. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024;10(2):107-112

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.