Introduction
Frontal bone fracture are most commonly fracture due to the projection in the facial region. It accounts for 5-15%1 of all facial fractures. Depending upon the fracture type, age of patient, medical conditions and aesthetic and functional status the treatment plan should be decided. Before proceeding to the treatment proper evaluation of the patient should be carried out such as GCS status, CSF leak, ophthalmology and neurosurgeon consultations. Most common complication such as meningitis, mucocele and cerebral abscess should be taken into consideration. Etiology consist of RTA, physical assult and sport injury.2
Case Report
24 years male reported to Bharati hospital Pune with chief complaint of road traffic accident. On examination it was noted that he had contused lacerated wound (CLW) on left side of frontal bone region measuring about 3*3*4cm in diameter. Primary care such as suturing of CLW was done in casualty with help of 3’0 silk sutures. 3D CT scan was advised which revealed fracture of anterior table fracture of frontal bone on left side (Figure 1).
Surgical procedure
General anesthesia was induced. Oral intubation was done. Painting and draping of operating field was done, 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline was infiltrated in the area to achieve vasoconstriction. The fracture site was exposed via extending the existing lacerated wound. It was a depressed comminuted fracture of anterior table fracture of frontal bone. Since it was only aesthetic deformity, the defect was flushed with periosteum intact. Titanium mesh was adapted and fixed at all corners with help of 2*4mm screw. Now a drill was introduced in centre of depressed part of bone and with help of 2*10mm screw, only 2 threads was introduced into the depressed bone and depressed bone was lifted up. Once the bone was lifted the depressed bony fragment was fixed with help of 2*4mm screw and adapted to titanium mesh. This technique help to aligned depressed bone fragment in appropriate position. Through irrigation was done with help of betadine and saline and closure was achieved with 3’0 silk suture (Figure 2). Patient recovered from anesthesia uneventfully. He received post operative analgesic and antibiotics for five days. The wound was healed uneventfully. Suture removal was done on seventh day postoperatively (Figure 3). Patient was satisfied with the result and no postoperative complications occurred. Patient was followed up for 6 month.
Discussion
Many algorithms for management of frontal sinus fractures vary widely. Appropriate treatment depends on an accurate diagnosis, clinical examination and CT scans. It is not uncommon for post craniofacial trauma patient to require augmentation of depressed craniofacial skeleton. Reconstruction and recontouring of these defects in natural esthetic fashion can pose challenge to clinician.
Various autogenous bone graft and alloplastic materials have been in use for this purpose i.e. titanium mesh, polymethyl methacrylate3, 4 autogenous bone and hydroxyapatite have been used with varying success. All materials and grafts have merits and demerits in their use.
Titanium mesh2 is easily available, no secondary site morbidity, ease of use, minimum complications and excellent post-operative results. Infection and foreign body reaction and are few demerits of alloplastic material.
Autogenous bone grafts5 such as iliac or rib require a second surgical site. This may lead to donor site morbidity, inability to obtain adequate bone for large defect.
Other alloplastic materials5 that have been used for such defects are hydroxyapatite, silicon rubber, acrylic metal plates and proplast. Growth limitation may be obviated by not placing alloplastic material across sutures in children with enlarging skulls.6