Get Permission Samson, Waghmare, Katara, and Pagare: Clinical correlation between tension headache, myofascial pain and occlusal disturbance in young adults a cross sectional study


Introduction

Primary headaches have increasingly become a matter of concern as there is an upsurge of this disorder among the population all over the world.1 The International Headache Society (HIS) broadly classified headache as primary, secondary, cranial neuralgias and central or peripheral causes of facial pain and other headaches (Table 1).2 The global burden of disease study 2010(GBD2010) have found tension type headache (TTH) and migraine to be 2nd and 3rd most prevalent disorder worldwide.3 The term tension type headache was coined by first classification committee of International Headache society.4 In a study conducted on the south Indian population the prevalence of TTH was found to be 35.1% with a highest prevalence among the younger population (40.1%).5 TTH is commonly found to be associated with stress, however several studies relate it to be muscular in origin. TTH is a featureless headache characterised by pain in the head and is diagnosed by excluding features of other types of headaches such as migraine.6

TTH can last from thirty minutes to several days and can be continuous in severe cases. The pain is mild or moderately intense and is described as tightness pressure or dull ache. The pain is usually experienced bilaterally as a band extending from the forehead across the sides of the head to the occiput and posterior neck muscles. Physical activity does not increase the intensity of the tension headache in contrast to migraine, wherein physical activity worsens the pain. Patients may present with photophobia or phonophobia occasionally. In the study conducted by Langemark et al to characterise the symtoms of Tension Type Headache 13% were found to develop symtoms of photophobia and 7% reported of phonophobia.7

Palpation of the head in patients with TTH reveals tenderness in pericranial muscles and tension in the nuchal musculature or trapezius.8, 9

Studies show that active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) elicit referred pain producing headache pattern in patients with TTH.10, 11, 12 Thus, speculations that myofascial structures may be associated with TTH.

Aim and Objective

  1. To co-relate the occurrence of Myofascial pain and occlusal disturbances in patients with TTH.

  2. To evaluate presence of MTrPs in muscles of mastication, head and neck muscles in patients with TTH

  3. To evaluate occlusal disturbances (missing teeth, malocclusion, wasting disorders, occlusal facets etc) in patients with TTH.

  4. To assess parafunctional habits in these patients.

  5. To evaluate the occurrence of MTrPs and TTH among males and females.

Materials and Methods

A cross sectional study was carried out and patients were randomly evaluated in the OPD of Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology. A total of 120 patients were evaluated of which 46 patients i.e. 23 males and 23 females aged 18 -35yrs were enrolled in this study. Other than their dental complaints these 120 patients were also asked for complaints of headache of more than six months duration which was not diagnosed and been treated with over the counter drugs. These patients were then referred to the neurology department for further diagnosis of their symptoms of headache and the ones diagnosed with TTH were included in the study i.e.46 of the 120 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study.

Ethical approval for this study (IREB/2020/OMDR/01) was provided by the Ethical Committee (Institutional Research and Ethical Board) on 02 March 2020. All patients signed an informed consent before their inclusion.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Young adults aged 18-35years.

  2. Patients having symptoms of headache for more than six months.

  3. Patients diagnosed with tension type headache.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with H/o psychological disorder and being treated for the same.

  2. Patients with H/O spondylosis and other spinal disorder.

  3. Patients being treated for migraine, cluster headache etc.

  4. Patients with history of head injury.

  5. Patients with past history of brain infection.

  6. Patients with hypertension/hypotension.

  7. Patients with H/o Hypoglycaemia.

  8. Patients suffering from acute or chronic sinusitis.

  9. Patients suffering from cold/cough.

  10. Patients addicted to alcohol.

  11. Patients with H/O Hyperacidity.

Patients diagnosed with tension type headache were included in the study. These patients were then evaluated for pain in the myofascial region. Their muscles of mastication and head and neck muscles were palpated for trigger points both active and passive and painful symptoms were evaluated on a VAS scale. These patients were also evaluated for malocclusion or occlusal discrepancies like missing teeth, generalized wasting disorders, occlusal facets and plunger cusps, loss of anterior and canine guidance. The number of tender muscles were recorded as well as the occlusal discrepancies and the data was tabulated. Statistical evaluation was carried out using chi square test. And the level of significance was established at 0.3 (p value).

Results

Gender distribution

Forty-six patients diagnosed with TTH were included in the study of which 23 were males and 23 females (Table 2).

Muscle tenderness

Of the 46 patients who complained of tension headache almost all the patients had trigger points on one or more than one muscle. 23 individuals (50%) showed MTrPs in temporalis muscle of which 13 were males and 10 were females. 21 patients showed tender MTrPs in masseter muscle (9 males and 12 females) On functional palpation 12 subjects (26.1%) complained of pain in medial pterygoid and 25 (54.3%) subjects had tender lateral pterygoid. 33 individuals (71.7%) had MTrPs in sternocleidomastoid 30 individuals (65.2%) had tender MTrPs in trapezius muscle (Table 3). However, none of these values were found to be of statistical significance. But most of the patients complaining of headache had tender trigger points on sternocleidomastoid muscle and trapezius muscle.

Malocclusion and occlusal discrepancies

On evaluation of the occlusion it was found that of the 46 patients 39 (84.7%) had Angle’s class I malocclusion, 5 (10.8%) were diagnosed with class II malocclusion and 2 (4.3%) had class three malocclusion (Table 4). The statistics shows a significant co-relation between angles II malocclusion and tension type headache.

All the 46 subjects showed some form of occlusal discrepancies in the form of excessive overjet or over bite, deep bite, spacing of teeth, crowding of teeth, proclined teeth, crossbite etc the distribution of the same is provided in the Table 5.

Parafunctional habits

17 patients (37%) having tension headache were found to be having parafunctional habits of either nail biting, bruxism, clenching or grinding. 25 of the 46 patients also reported of unilateral chewing habit (Table 6, Table 7).

It was also noted that all the subjects who were examined followed a sedentary lifestyle.

Table 1

The International Classification of Headache Disorders (2nd ed.)

Part. 1 Primary Headache Disorders

1

Migraine

2

Tension- type headache (TTH)

3

Cluster Headache and other Trigerminal autonomic cephalalgias (TAC)

4

Others Primary Headaches

Part. 2 Secondary Headache Disorders

5

Headache Attributed to head and/or neck trauma

6

Headache Attributed to cranial or cervical vascular disorder

7

Headache Attributed to nonvascular intracranial disorder

8

Headache Attributed to substance or its withdrawal

9

Headache Attributed to infection

10

Headache Attributed to infection

11

Headache or facial pain attributed to disorder of cranium. Neck, eyes, ears, nose, sinuses, teeth, mouth, or other facial or cranial structures

12

Headache Attributed to psychiatric disorder

Part. 3 Cranial neuralgias and central or Peripheral causes of facial pain and others headaches

13

Cranial neuralgias and central or peripheral causes of facial pain

14

Other headache, cranial neuralgia, central or primary facial pain

Table 2

Gender distribution

Gender

Number

Percentage

Males

23

50.0%

Females

23

50.0%

Table 3

Muscle tenderness

Males

Females

Total

Chi square, p

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Males v/s females

Temporalis

13

56.5

10

43.2

23

50.0

0.766, 0.3816

Masseter

9

39.1

12

52.2

21

45.7

0.771, 0.3798

Medial pterygoid

6

26.1

6

26.1

12

26.1

0.000, 1,000

Lateral pterygoid

14

60.9

11

47.8

25

54.3

0.766, 0.3816

SCM

15

65.2

18

78.3

33

71.1

0.771, 0.3798

Trapezius

13

56.5

17

73.9

30

65.2

1.500, 0.2207

Table 4

Angles malocclusion

Males

Females

Total

Chi-square, p

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Males v/s Females

Class I

20

87.0%

19

82.6%

39

84.8%

0.165, 0.6847

Class II

2

8.7%

3

13.0%

5

10.9%

0.220, 0.0689

Class III

1

4.3%

1

4.3%

2

4.3%

0.000, 1.000

Table 5

Occlusal discrepancies

Males

Females

Total

Chi-Square, p

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Males v/s Females

Overjet

1

4.3%

4

17.4%

5

10.9%

1.976, 0.1599

Deep bite

4

17.4%

4

17.4%

8

17.4%

0.000, 1.000

Proclination

5

21.7%

5

21.7%

10

21.7%

0.000, 1.000

Crowding

3

13.0%

2

8.7%

5

10.9%

1.976, 0.1599

Crossbite

2

8.7%

1

4.3%

3

6.5%

0.220, 0.0689

Open bite

2

8.7%

2

8.7%

4

8.7%

0.000, 1.000

Spacing

2

8.7%

2

8.7%

4

8.7%

0.000, 1.000

Increased vertical height

0

0.0%

1

4.3%

1

2.2%

0.000, 0.3173

Table 6

Parafunctional habits

Males

Females

Total

Chi-Square

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Males v/s Females

Nail-biting

7

30.4%

4

17.4%

11

23.9%

1.052, 0.150

Clenching

3

13.0%

1

4.3%

4

8.7%

1.071, 0.151

Bruxism

0

0.0%

1

4.3%

1

2.2%

0.000, 0.3173

Grinding

0

0.0%

1

4.3%

1

2.2%

0.000, 0.3173

Table 7

Chewing habits

Males

Females

Total

Chi- Square

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Males v/s Females

Unilateral

8

34.8%

17

73.9%

25

54.3%

6.943, 0.0084

Bilateral

15

65.2%

6

26.1%

21

45.7%

6.943, 0.0084

Discussion

According to Fricton, headache determines an increased central sensitization to pain and an exacerbation of pain symptoms in the craniocervical mandibular joint. This motivates the patient to seek help for headaches rather than myofascial pain. Headaches can have a myofascial as well as a vascular component often termed as a mixed variety of headache. So even if the headache has been treated the trigger points will still be left back to exacerbate the pain.13

In our study we found that all our subjects who suffered from tension type headache had at least one or more muscles of the head, face and neck region which were tender to palpation or had active or latent trigger points present. As mentioned earlier tension type headache maybe referred pain from the neck and shoulder muscles. This is underpinned by a study in which hypertonic saline was injected into the anterior or posterior temporalis muscles to induce experimental pain in healthy individuals. These individuals perceived this as head pain. Similar evidence has been obtained for upper trapezius muscle.14

In the present study 70% patients complaining of TTH had TrPs in trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles as against the other muscles of mastication. These TrPs may be responsible for referred pain in the temporal and occipital region mimicking headache. New researches point toward myofascial trigger points which may be active or latent palpable nodules within taut band of skeletal muscle that are hypersensitive to compression, responding to local twitch response or familiar referred pain that cause headaches. Referred pain evoked by active trigger points in the cervicocranial region reproduces at least part of the pain pattern experienced during headache attacks.15 Whereas referred pain evoked by mechanical stimulation of latent trigger points does not reflect a usual or familiar headache pattern. Similarly, when there were active trigger points patients have greater headache intensity and frequency and longer duration of headache than those with latent trigger points.16 Our study fails to point out whether the TrPs were active or latent which is a shortfall of the study.

Occlusal interferences and malocclusion

It has been suggested that occlusal disharmonies contribute to condylar displacement and occlusal avoidance patterns, and both can contribute to abnormal proprioceptive input and sustained muscle contraction in an attempt to correct the poor occlusal relationships. Studies also show long term masticatory hyperactivity of masticatory muscles caused by faulty occlusion can lead to muscle pain. Thus, tenderness in head and neck muscles caused due to prolonged contraction can be perceived as headache. Thus, treatment of tender muscles of head and neck region should help relieve headache in patients with cTTH.17

In our study the subjects who had tension headache also had some or the other form of occlusal discrepancies in form of increased overjet, overbite, deep bite, crowding, proclination, spacing etc and all the patient also had TrPs in head and neck muscles. As per literature a non-harmonious relationship between occlusion, muscles and the temporomandibular joint may be perceived as pericranial tenderness or headache. Graff-Radford contends that TMD elicit or exacerbate headache because of an overlap of innervations with the trigeminal nerve. As previously stated, the trigeminal nuclei for mechanoreceptive, proprioceptive, and pain sensations are in close proximity.18

Karppinen et al along with physiotherapists investigated occlusal adjustment for the treatment of chronic neck and headaches over a period of 60 months. After providing occlusal adjustments they concluded that the occlusal adjustments were efficient in 80% of the cases with also reduction in head and neck pain during movement and hence concluded that occlusal adjustment can be effective in treatment of chronic neck pain and headaches.19

Parafunctional habit

Parafunctional oral habits such as bruxism and clenching and nail biting can be a way of tension release as well as a learned behavioural response. Some patients with these problems show an inability to verbalize anger hostility or anxiety and as stress increased an increase in the contraction of masticatory musculature through these habits produce trigger points and pain.20

In our study a total of 17 out of 46 subjects had parafunctional habits such as nail biting, bruxism, clenching or grinding their teeth although this was not co related with stress or anxiety in these patients. Several studies have showed a correlation between frequency and intensity of headache and presence of TMDs which also show tenderness in muscles of mastication. According to Carlo di Paolo et al (2017) headache makes pain parameters more intense and frequent, complicating dysfunctional diseases both in diagnostic and treatment phase.21

According to Ciancaglini and Radaelli they suggested that 70% of headache patients also had clinical confirmation of TMD and vice versa.22 According to Cesar Fernandez – de- las – penas 2011, a study conducted on children and adolescents demonstrated that there was tenderness in muscles of the temporalis, masseter and sternocleidomastoid i.e. they acted as trigger points in children with tension headache.11

Conclusion

To conclude in our study, it was observed that all patients who experienced TTH also had tender muscles of head and neck region which co-existed with occlusal disharmony and parafunctional habits, thus establishing a correlation between myofascial pain and tension type headaches. When the equilibrium between the muscles of the head, face neck, occlusal harmony and temporomandibular joint is not maintained these can lead to chronic conditions and develop TrPs which in turn can be perceived as pericranial tenderness or headache. Hence patients with headache should also be evaluated for tenderness of muscles in the pericranial region. Despite an obvious lack of a well-designed longitudinal study that irrefutably confirms the relationship between headache progression, muscle tenderness and occlusal discrepancies, a clinical correlation can be seen. Accordingly, a multidisciplinary approach towards these patients is necessary to improve diagnosis and treatment.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1 

L J Stovner K Hagen R Jensen Z Katsarava RB Lipton AI Scher The global burden of headache prevalence and disability worldwideCephalgia200727193210

2 

YJ Woo Headache in AdolescentsJ Korean Med Assoc200952876878

3 

T Vos AD Flaxman M Naghavi R Lozano C Michaud M Ezati Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1106 sequel of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2012: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease studyLancet2010380216396

4 

Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial painCephalalgia198887

5 

GB Kulkarni GN Rao G Gururaj LJ Stovner TJ Steiner Headache disorders and public ill-health in India: prevalence estimates in Karnataka StateJ Headache Pain20151616710.1186/s10194-015-0549-x

6 

A Fumal J Schoenen Tension-type headache: current research and clinical managementLancet Neurol200871708310.1016/s1474-4422(07)70325-3

7 

M Langemark J Olesen Pericranial Tenderness in Tension Headache: A Blind, Controlled StudyCephalalgia1987742495510.1046/j.1468-2982.1987.0704249.x

8 

GL Lipchik KA Holroyd FJ Donnell Enteroceptive suppression periods and pericranial muscle tenderness in chronic tension type headache: effects of psychopathology, chronicity and disabilityCephalalgia20002063846

9 

F Sakai S Ebihara M Akiyama Pericranial Muscle hardness in tension type headache: A non- invasive measurement method and its clinical applicationBrain199511852331

10 

C Alonso-Blanco C Fernandez-De-Las-Penas DM Fernandez-Mayoralas Prevalence and anatomical localization of muscle referred pain from active trigger points in head and neck musculature in adults and children with chronic tension type headachePain Med201112145363

11 

C Fernandez -De-Las-Penas D M Fernandez-Mayoralas R Ortega-Santiago Referred pain from myofascial trigger points in head and neck- shoulder muscles reproduce head pain features in children with chronic tension type headacheJ Headache Pain2011123543

12 

CF De Las Peñas ML Cuadrado RD Gerwin JA Pareja Referred Pain From the Trochlear Region in Tension‐Type Headache: A Myofascial Trigger Point From the Superior Oblique MuscleJ Head Face Pain2005456731710.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05140.x

13 

JR Fricton J Ferreira J Fricton N Rhodus Transformative Care for Orofacial DisordersOrofacial DisordersSpringerCham201730115

14 

PT Schmidt-Hansen P Svensson TS Jensen T Graven-Nielsen FW Bach Patterns of Experimentally Induced Pain in Pericranial MusclesCephalalgia20062655687710.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01078.x

15 

C Fernández-de-las-Peñas ML Cuadrado L Arendt-Nielsen DG Simons JA Pareja Myofascial Trigger Points and Sensitization: An Updated Pain Model for Tension-Type HeadacheCephalalgia20072753839310.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01295.x

16 

L Arendt‐Nielsen Headache: muscle tension, trigger points and referred pain201510.1111/ijcp.12651

17 

AF Lima AN Cavalcanti LRM Martins GM Marchi Occlusal interferences: how can this concept influence the clinical practice?Eur J Dent20104448791

18 

SB Graff-Radford Temporomandibular Disorders and HeadacheDent Clin North Am20075111294410.1016/j.cden.2006.09.005

19 

K Karppinen S Eklund E Suoninen M Eskelin P Kirveskari Adjustment of dental occlusion in treatment of chronic cervicobrachial pain and headacheJ Oral Rehabil19992697152110.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00448.x

20 

J Okeson Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion7th EditionMosby2012

21 

CD Paolo A D’Urso P Papi FD Sabato D Rosella G Pompa Temporomandibular Disorders and Headache: A Retrospective Analysis of 1198 PatientsPain Res Manag201710.1155/2017/3203027

22 

R Ciancaglini G Radaelli The relationship between headache and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder in the general populationJ Dent200129293810.1016/s0300-5712(00)00042-7



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 03-10-2020

Accepted : 14-12-2020


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2021.011


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1220

PDF Downloaded: 484