Get Permission Thomas, Rajasekharan, Jacob, Muniyan, and Bhaskar: Association of mandibular third molar impaction and radiological risk predictors using orthopantomogram in a tertiary dental care centre in Kerala- A retrospective analysis


Introduction

The mandibular third molars are the most frequent impacted tooth.1 The relationship of these mandibular third molar roots to the variable position and anatomy of the mandibular canal containing the inferior alveolar nerve may causes different surgical challenges. These will result with unpredictable and undesirable surgical outcomes.2 The inferior alveolar nerve enters the mandibular canal through the mandibular foramen on the medial surface of the ascending mandibular ramus.3 The most appropriate radiographic techniques for viewing these impacted teeth is by using an Orthopantomogram (OPG). The Orthopantomogram scanners require less technical skill to operate and have low costs and with a relatively low radiation dosage comparable to Computed Tomography machines.3 In Orthopantomogram an overall view of all-important anatomical structures with the relationship and proximity of the mandibular impacted third molar roots inferior alveolar canal viewing is possible.4 The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of the relative relationship and proximity of the mandibular third molar roots to the inferior alveolar canal in relation to age and sex using Orthopantomogram in a Tertiary Dental Care Centre in Kerala.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College, Alappuzha. The radiographic records of patients with impacted third molar were selected in a retrospective manner, from July 2019 till December 2019 for a period of 6 months. All panoramic radiographs were taken by ORTHOPHOS XG, by Denstply Sirona, USA, panoramic machine. A total of 375 digital panoramic radiographs of patients in the age group of 20–35 years were interpreted and assessed for the mandibular third molar impactions. The panoramic radiographs presenting with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars with root completion and presence of mandibular second molars were selected for the study. Those panoramic radiographs with congenital absence of mandibular third molars, mandibular third molars extracted previously, trauma/surgery to the mandibular site of study, developmental anomalies affecting the jaws and radiographic evidence of pathologies of the impacted mandibular third molar teeth of mandible which could obscure the visualization of the periapical region or IAC were excluded from the study. The type of impaction of mandibular third molars was assessed by Winter’s method5 as mesioangular, distoangular, vertical or horizontal impactions. Rood and Shehab’s criteria6 will be used to assess the presence of each of in root of mandibular third molar and Inferior Alveolar Canal changes. The data was analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Descriptive statistics and Chi square test were done.

Results

Table 1

Age group

Frequency

Percent

20-24 years

520

73.2

25-29 years

158

22.3

30-34 years

32

4.5

Total

710

100.0

Table 2

Gender

Frequency

Percent

Male

342

48.2

Female

368

51.8

Total

710

100.0

Table 3

Radiological signs

Frequency

Percent

Darkening of root

284

40.0

Deflection of root

43

6.1

Narrowing of root

8

1.1

Dark and bifid apex root

7

1.0

Interruption of white line of canal

248

34.9

Diversion of canal

22

3.1

Narrowing of canal

9

1.3

None

89

12.5

Total

710

100.0

Table 4

Types of Impactions

Frequency

Percent

Vertical

267

37.6

Mesioangular

324

45.6

Distoangular

17

2.4

Horizontal

102

14.4

Total

710

100.0

Table 5

Impaction

Male

Female

p value

Vertical

111(41.6)

156(58.4)

0.006*

Mesioangular

158(48.8)

166(51.2)

0.771

Distoangular

5(29.4)

12(70.6)

0.117

Horizontal

68(66.7)

34(33.3)

0.00*

Table 6

Impaction

20-24

25-29

30-34

p value

Vertical

190(71.2)

63(23.6)

14(5.2)

0.573

Mesioangular

255(78.7)

61(18.8)

8(2.5)

0.004*

Distoangular

11(64.7)

4(23.5)

2(11.8)

0.329

Horizontal

64(62.7)

30(29.4)

8(7.8)

0.024*

Table 7

Radiological relationship

Vertical

Mesioangular

Distoangular

Horizontal

Total

p value

Darkening of root

92(32.4)

158(55.6)

6(2.1)

28(9.9)

284

0.00*

Deflection of root

11(25.6)

20(46.5)

0(0)

12(27.9)

43

0.03*

Narrowing of root

5(62.5)

2(25)

1(12.5)

0(0)

8

0.082

Dark and Bifid apex of root

3(42.9)

3(42.9)

0(0)

1(14.3)

7

0.972

Interruption of white line of canal

108(43.5)

99(39.9)

7(2.8)

34(13.7)

248

0.082

Diversion of canal

8(36.4)

14(63.6)

0(0)

0(0)

22

0.143

Narrowing of canal

1(11.1)

7(77.8)

0(0)

1(11.1)

9

0.256

Table 8

Radiological relationship

20-24 years

25-29 years

30-34 years

Total

p value

Darkening of root

216(76.1)

61(21.5)

7(2.5)

284

0.081

Deflection of root

31(72.1)

8(18.6)

4(9.3)

43

0.270

Narrowing of root

8(100)

0(0)

0(0)

8

0.228

Dark and Bifid apex of root

7(100)

0(0)

0(0)

7

0.275

Interruption of white line of canal

172(69.4)

62(25)

14(5.6)

248

0.205

Diversion of canal

16(72.7)

6(27.3)

0(0)

22

0.527

Narrowing of canal

6(66.7)

2(22.2)

1(11.1)

9

0.626

Table 9

Radiological relationship

Male

Female

Total

p value

Darkening of root

143(50.4)

141(49.6)

284

0.342

Deflection of root

19(44.2)

24(55.8)

43

0.590

Narrowing of root

1(12.5)

7(87.5)

8

0.042*

Dark and Bifid apex of root

1(14.3)

6(85.7)

7

0.071

Interruption of white line of canal

122(49.2)

126(50.8)

248

0.689

Diversion of canal

7(31.8)

15(68.2)

22

0.119

Narrowing of canal

4(44.4)

5(55.6)

9

0.822

From the 375 panoramic radiographs evaluated for our study, 710 mandibular third molar impactions were found. Out of the 710 mandibular third molar impactions, 368 (51.8%) belong to females and 342 (48.2%) belong to males. The age group selected for the population was 20-35 years. The highest frequency of impactions, 520 (73.2%) belonged to the 20-24 year age group. The evaluation of the pattern of impaction as per Winter’s classification showed, there was predominance of mesioangular impactions, 324 (45.6%), followed by vertical, 267 (37.6%). Least predominant impaction among the radiographs was found with distoangular impactions, 17(2.4%). Among the radiological signs as per Rood and Shehab criteria, darkening of root was having the highest frequency, 284 (40%), followed by interruption of white line of canal, 248 (34.9%). Least frequent among the radiological signs were narrowing of root, 8 (1.1%) and dark and bifid apex root, 7 (1%).

When the pattern of impaction was correlated with age and sex, it was found that in the case of age, mesioangular impactions (p value-0.004) and horizontal impactions (p value-0.024) showed statistically significant results. Correlation with sex, showed statistically significant values associated with vertical (p value-0.006) and horizontal impactions (p value-0.00). The radiological signs when correlated with pattern of impaction, shows statistically significant results associated with darkening of root (p value -0) and deflection of root (p value-.03). On correlation with age, even though there were no statistically significant results, darkening of root and interruption of white line were having relatively high values especially in the 20-24 age group. There were statistically significant results when radiological signs were correlated with sex, in the case of narrowing of root (p value-.042) even though darkening of the root accounted for the most common radiological risk predictor in both sexes.

Discussion

Those individual teeth which remain unerupted due to a lack of eruptive forces, heredity, lack of space either due to small jaws or large teeth, or incomplete mandibular growth are addressed as embedded teeth.7 Among the various impactions, mandibular third molar impaction is more symptomatic and quite disturbing.8 This in turn is associated with difficulty of extraction and various associated complications such as pain, swelling, inferior alveolar nerve damage, alveolitis, incomplete root removal, bleeding, delayed healing, postoperative infection and bony spicules. Associated with the mandibular third molars removal, inferior alveolar canal injury has been reported with a frequency ranging from 0.6% to5.3%.9 Up to some extent such complications can be anticipated prior to surgery by using radiographs, which can help surgeon to take steps to avoid the likelihood of their occurrence.10

Studies have shown that as 2D imaging modalities like panoramic radiography is capable of predicting the relationship between the third molar and the mandibular canal as accurate as CBCT.11, 12 Moreover the radiation dose of a panoramic radiograph is lower than that from four periapical views.13 Although 3D imaging modalities provide clear picture, but because of their reduced accessibility and high cost and the aforesaid features of panoramic radiography, the latter is more preferred for planning third molar extraction.11, 12, 13, 14

The age group selected for the study was 20-35 years. The highest frequency of impactions, belonged to the 20-24 year age group. This is in accordance with the studies by Hazza et al15 and Costa et al.16 In our study there was a relative female predisposition, in accordance with the studies by Jerjes et al,17 Knutsson et al,18 Szalma et al19 Quek SL et al20 and Kim et al21 observed a female preponderance. This may be because of the prior stoppage of physical growth in females contributing to a smaller jaw size compared to males; where the jaw growth continues during the third molar eruption provides more space for the tooth.20, 22 In the present study, the most common angulation type of impacted mandibular third molar was mesioangular (45.6%). Few studies were in agreement with the similar findings.8, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 The are a few factors contributing for the same including their late development and maturation, path of eruption, and lack of space in mandible at later age.27 The radiographic risk predictors were evaluated based on Rood and Shehab criteria.6 There has been an estimated specificity ranging from 96 to 98% for radiographic signs, as predictor of nerve injury.10 There were a few studies which depicted radiographic signs associated with nerve damage.4, 25, 28, 29 Even though the radiographic sign associated with nerve damage in the majority of the studies was the diversion of the canal;30 our study went in accordance with those studies6, 11, 25, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34 where darkening of the roots accounts the most in frequency.

The studies by Rood et al., Kipp et al., Nevus et al. suggested darkening of the root, interruption of the white line of the mandibular canal and deflection of the mandibular canal are alarming concerns of inferior alveolar nerve damage.6, 34, 35

The darkening of the roots can be because of the thinning of the cortical plates36 or due to the loss of dentine caused by grooving of the root by the canal.31

In our study when the radiological risk predictors were correlated with the type of impaction, age, sex and side, the following results were seen. When correlated with age, the highest number of radiological risk factors were found in the 20-24 age group and the lowest number were found in the 30-34 age group. In the 20-24 age group, darkening of the roots were the most followed by interruption of white line. In the other two age groups, interruption of white line accounts for the most; the least was found with narrowing of root, diversion of canal, dark and bifid apex in various groups. Except for the darkening of roots; which has got a slight male predominance all radiological risk predictors showed a female preponderance. When correlated with the type of impaction, darkening of root has been found predominant among mesioangular and horizontal types of impactions. These results were statistically significant. Interruption of white line was the most common radiological risk predictor associated with vertical and distoangular impactions.

Conclusion

The study concluded that mesioangular impactions are the most common impaction in our study population. The largest number of impactions belonged to the 20-24 age group. The most frequent radiological risk predictor as per the study is darkening of the root, followed by interruption of white line. Though the sensitivity and specificity of Panoramic radiograph is low when compared with other 3D imaging modalities the former is capable of predicting the relationship between the third molar and the mandibular canal accurately.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

P Deshpande MV Guledgud K Patil Proximity of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars to the Inferior Alveolar Canal and Its Radiographic Predictors: A Panoramic Radiographic StudyJ Maxillofac Oral Surg201312214551

2 

M Srinivas TB Susarla How well do clinicians estimate third molar extraction difficulty?J Oral Maxillofac Surg20056321919

3 

MA Pogrel D Dorfman H Fallah The anatomic structure of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in the third molar regionJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2009671124524

4 

BF Blaeser MA August RB Donoff LB Kaban TB Dodson Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extractionJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200361441721

5 

GB Winter Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted third molar- a complete treatise on the operative technic with clinical diagnoses and radiographic interpretationsAmerican Medical Book CompanySt Louis1926

6 

JP Rood BA Shehab The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgeryBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg1990281205

7 

A Ramamurthy J Pradha S Jeeva N Jeddy J Sunitha S Kumar Prevalence of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Agenesis: A Radiographic South Indian StudyIndian Acad Oral Med Radiol20122431736

8 

RM Kramer AC Williams The incidence of impacted teeth. A survey at Harlem hospitalOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol197029223741

9 

S Sandhu T Kaur Radiographic evaluation of the status of third molars in the Asian-Indian studentsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg20056356405

10 

S Gupta RR Bhowate N Nigam S Saxena Evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars by panoramic radiographyISRN Dent20112011406714

11 

H Bali D Yadav K Adhikari S Mahanta R Tripathi B Sapkota The Relationship of The Mandibular Canal to The Roots of Impacted Third Molars- The Root Factor: A Panoramic Radiographic StudyJ Lumbini Med Coll202081229

12 

MJ Fatima MJ Ahmed Assessment of the relation of the mandibular third molar to the mandibular canal :A mete analysis comparing panoramic radiograph to cone beam CTAJST201564131922

13 

ZM Al-Bahrani ZH Al-Ghurabi SS Hassan Orthopantomographic pre-surgical assessment of mandibular third molar teeth form and structures using surgical findings asa gold standardJ Bagh Coll Dent201224211822

14 

Y Nakagawa H Ishii Y Nomura NY Watanabe D Hoshiba K Kobayashi Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiographyJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200765713038

15 

AM Hazza'a ZSM Albashaireh A Bataineh The relationship of the inferior dental canal to the roots of impacted mandibular third molars in a Jordanian populationJ Contemp Dent Pract200672718

16 

FWG Costa EHL Fontenele TP Bezerra TR Ribeiro BGDS Carneiro ECS Soares Correlation between radiographic signs of third molar proximity with inferior alveolar nerve and postoperative occurrence of neurosensory disorders. A prospective, double-blind studyActa Cir Bras20132832217

17 

W Jerjes T Upile P Shah F Nhembe D Gudka P Kafas Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery revisitedOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2010109333545

18 

K Knutsson B Brehmer L Lysell M Rohlin Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removalOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod1996821107

19 

J Szalma E Lempel S Jeges G Szabό L Olasz The prognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferior alveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molar removal: Retrospective study of 400 casesOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2010109229430

20 

SL Quek CK Tay KH Tay SL Toh KC Lim Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: A retrospective radiographic surveyInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg200332554852

21 

JC Kim SS Choi SJ Wang SG Kim Minor complications after mandibular third molar surgery: Type, incidence, and possible preventionOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod20061022411

22 

SV Mead Incidence of impacted teethInt J Orthod19301688590

23 

W Linden P Cleaton-Jones M Lownie Diseases and lesions associated with third molars. Review of 1001 casesOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod19957921425

24 

FN Hattab MA Rawashdeh MS Fahmy Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian studentsOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod1995791249

25 

M Sedaghatfar MA August TB Dodson Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extractionJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200563137

26 

T Nagaraj L Balraj K Irugu S Rajashekarmurthy Sreelakshmi Radiographic assessment of distribution of mandibular third molar impaction: A retrospective studyJ Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol20162821459

27 

D Denio M Torabinejad LK Bakland Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandiblesJ Endod19921841615

28 

E Valmaseda-Castellón L Berini-Aytés C Gay-Escoda Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractionsOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod200192437783

29 

ACA Gomes BCE Vasconcelos EDO Silva AF Caldas ICP Neto Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molarsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg20086622569

30 

C Palma-Carrió B García-Mira C Larrazabal-Morón MA Peñarrocha-Diago Radiographic signs associated with inferior alveolar nerve damage following lower third molar extractionMed Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal201015688690

31 

GL Howe HG Poyton Prevention of damage to the inferior dental nerve during the extraction of mandibular third molarsBr Dent J196010935563

32 

GW Bell Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcomeBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg2004421217

33 

G Monaco M Montevecchi GA Bonetti MRA Gatto L Checchi Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molarsJ Am Dent Assoc200413533128

34 

DP Kipp BH Goldstein WW Weiss Dysaesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1377 surgical proceduresJ Am Dent Assoc1980100218592

35 

FS Neves TC Souza SM Almeida F Haiterneto DQ Freitas FN Bóscolo Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canalDentomaxillofac Radiol20124175537

36 

PM Mahasantipiya NW Savage PA Monsour RJ Wilson Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molarsDentomaxillofac Radiol200534315463



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 20-10-2022

Accepted : 15-11-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2022.042


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 631

PDF Downloaded: 170